Reviews

The Hunchback of Notre Dame by Victor Hugo

soyqueso's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

elyn_k's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

kpfeil's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

4.25/5stars

I really enjoyed this! It was WAY more accessible than I thought it would be, and the story was very easy to follow (although there were a handful of characters it took me a while to keep straight). The story was fun, dramatic, and filled with anxious, fast-paced scenes but also very sad, insightful moments. I also really enjoy Hugo's writing style.

jomarch412's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

What a great novel. I was worried about trying to read it 40 years after I first bought and read it. However, Tristan and the Classics YouTube channel gave me the encouraging push I needed to pull it back out for a second reading. I wouldn't say it was an "easy" read, but -- oh my goodness -- was it ever so good! It has been many years since I have read classic literature. The one standout difference is that reading a book like this made me think. I mean, reading Hugo put my mind to work, which felt enriching and satisfying.
The first page had me worried that I wouldn't be able to concentrate enough to read it. I was shocked when I looked at the clock and realized I had read straight through it for 3 hours! Took a lot of notes and learned a great deal about Paris in that time period. Greatly enjoyed it and was just as moved emotionally (more so, even) than I had been after reading it 40 years ago.
The Walter Cobb translation is my favorite. Some of the recent translations seemed overly concerned with flowery and politically-correct verbiage. I love this version the best. An excellent treatise on human nature.

stivaktis's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

For an audiobook, this took me a long while.

There's not much to judge in a classic; I can only say my personal opinion of it.

I had some issues with the narrator of this particular edition. While overall pretty good, he tended to pitch his voice strangely while doing most voices, sounding more like a Monty Python sketch than an actual narration.
I also could have lived without a lot of the things going on. I didn't mind the whole "the book has killed the edifice" thing that did drag on and repeated itself as much as I minded the constant narration of Latin and French songs and hymns throughout the audiobook, as well as the frantic monologues of the Recluse and 90% of the scene with the king. Those parts I loathed as they dragged on forever and the narration made them much worse.

I did enjoy the whole of it, however. It was interesting to see where such well-known characters started and how they've changed in the general conscience and pop culture over a couple of centuries. It was also extremely interesting to read Hugo right after Tolkien; both are incredibly angry about something they're extremely passionate about (architecture and nature), and they spend chapters upon chapters throwing sophisticated shade at the aggressors. Honestly, more books like that are needed.

I'll give the book this as a final note: despite me knowing the story pretty well, and being unaware only of very minor characters and subplots, the very ending of it is absolutely heartbreaking.

Generally, it's a book that deserves its fame and stands the test of time. Strangely, much like a building does, in Hugo's mind. This one did it.

synthecision's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

A farcical comedy that evolves into an ironic tragedy, and in which architecture is virtually a protagonist; strewn with both lengthy, didactic digressions and brief, poignant moments.

chellereetz's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

I'm going to Paris for the first time later this year and thought I'd read this before I left, and I used the audiobook for most of it.

Wow.

I don't know what the publishing process was like in the 1800s, Victor Hugo really could've used an editor. But there's a reason his books are classics.

cornelia07's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional funny mysterious tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

elisram95's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

The read question is, what happened to DJALI?

sarasaral's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.75

Det jag uppskattat mest med boken är dess sett att ge en bild av hur en såg på livet, kärleken och konst. Hur mycket saker är samma fast för andra saker. Den var bättre än vad jag trodde den skulle var, eller jag gillade den iaf mer än vad jag trodde. Är glatt överraskad. 

Tagit lång tid att läsa men har varit underhållande varje gång jag plockat upp den igen. Hans sätt att skriva gör den lätt att plocka upp igen, då han ofta påminner läsaren om vad som skett ÄLSKAR sånt. Har reserverat Les Miserables, den skrev han mer än 30 år efter denna, kul om en ser någon skillnad i hans skrivande.



Anteckningar jag skrev innan och medan jag läste boken (OBS SPOILERS):

”Svenska boken blir denna, chockad att det är samma kille som skrivit les miserables.

Massa beskrivningar, denna kan bli tuff att läsa. Mycket gammalt språk. Kämpa! 

Kul hur de beskriver ”dagens ungdom” exakt som den beskrivs idag, inte mycket som ändrats på hundratals år hahah

Har kommit in i språket mer och fnissar till stundtals, gillar den verkligen 

Saker går långsamt men det är samtidigt bam bam, det gillar jag!

Okej så nu är esmeralda gift med poeten som har blivit omhändertagen av frollo
Men frollo har fortfarande ringaren också som han tagit hand om, som försökte hoppa på esmeralda som blev räddad av ferbus som hon nu är kär i
Hittills känns esmeralda äcklad av ringaren

Några av namnen på platserna känner jag igen som tunnelbanestationer i Paris, kul!

En lååppåång del som bara beskriver hur Paris såg ut, ganska intressant men läser inte den delen jättenoga

Frollo har en bror, Jehan (var han ev av de olydiga studenterna i början?)  som han raisar som sin son, adopterar quasimodo för han tycker synd om honom, ser sin bror i honom

Smått intressant om att det skriva ordet dödar byggnaden. Om att vi tidigare skrev med byggnader och sten och det var mer långsiktigt, jämfört med en bok som kan tändas med eld. Samma som vi pratar om att internet dödar boken, och att boken är mer bastant men internet kan få ett virus eller raderas, typ. 

Kul passage om en döv som förhör en döv
Det kapitlet är verkligen mästerligt skriven, skulle kunna passa som en novell. Favorit hittills. Känns som en scen från en bra film, kan se den framför mig.

Gillar att författaren påminner oss läsare lite om karaktärers tidigare drag och vad de tidigare gått igenom i boken. Väldigt bra för mig som läser oftast utsträckt på flera veckor. 

Gillar att det är som små noveller som bygger upp till helhetens historia 

När den får flow då jävlar får den flow, läser noggrant och intresserat

Fint citat ”hennes bröst sönderslets av snyftningar liksom på den första dagen; denna sorg blir aldrig gammal, ty för en mor, som har förlorat sitt barn är det alltid den första dagen” s. 352

Fnissade åt ” Febus de Châteaupers fick ocksà ett tragiskt slut, ty han gifte sig” s. 540