foolforscifi's review against another edition

Go to review page

The subject of this book is super interesting but I did not like the narrator. The way that an audio book is narrated is make or break for whether or not I can finish the book and the narrators inflection grated on my nerves.

ratvsrobot's review

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful informative inspiring medium-paced

3.75

kelleym99's review against another edition

Go to review page

Love the topic, but did not love the writing. Found it dry and repetitive. Enjoyed the beginning, forced myself to get to the middle, and eventually gave up

froglikehumanoid's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging hopeful informative inspiring medium-paced

4.5

georgea_1234's review against another edition

Go to review page

hopeful informative reflective

4.0

abimedler's review against another edition

Go to review page

5.0

I absolutely loved this book. It opened my eyes to a whole new world. I highly recommend giving it a read. Meg Lowman tells a wonderful and engaging story while also providing readers with a fascinating insight into her vast knowledge and experience.

lauramacaulay's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Meg Lowman seems like such a genuine delight of a human being with infectious enthusiasm for all things nature. She's got a gift for crafting lush descriptions of forest worlds that make me itch for my hiking shoes. I'd like nothing better than to go adventuring with her. But do I want to finish her book? Regretfully not. When you're on the third chapter and you find yourself saying again, "Hey, didn't I just read this just a few pages ago?" you feel less compelled to soldier on. I also got an impression of being given a list of science facts that might go sprawling on forever. Delightful, enthusiastically rendered facts, but facts just the same--and there are only so many facts a narrative can carry before we get irretrievably lost in the weeds. Editing, please!

ninakinsmn's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

I liked the first half of the book better than the second half. She repeats herself repetitively and, as a nattering nabob of negativism, I found her optimism about the efficaciousness of eco-tourism as a solution to environmental devastation somewhat annoying. I also tend to have a certain amount of difficulty giving credit to people for caring about the environment if they are frequent fliers. Yeah yeah yeah, I get it. To study forests, you need to be able to go to where there still are some and that generally involves getting on a plane, but still…

ghost_rider's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous hopeful informative slow-paced

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

victorias_books's review against another edition

Go to review page

slow-paced

1.0

This book was painful to get through which was disappointing as a woman in science who usually enjoys these kinds of books. The way it was written felt very scatter-brained. A page/paragraph would start off on one thought then a couple sentences in you are getting sidetracked with an onslaught of lists, procedures, people, bugs, birds, etc.. To me, I think the science and lessons learned from the trees was lost in the noise. The only thing I was able to retain was about figs and wasps because it was lowkey horrifying. The blurbs about certain species of trees in between chapters were actually okay too.