I love that this is both pragmatic (not in the sense that any of these ideas might be implemented, because I for sure do not see that happening, but merely in that it adopts some very concrete comparisons that help us to understand that these proposals are not that unreasonable at all) and daring (fresh!), and also visionary in its broad scope. But I do wonder about certain ideas - for e.g. with the COST, how are we gonna determine assets that aren't tangible? Small quibbles like that mean I can't embrace its manifesto wholeheartedly. Worth reading, though, but it is definitely quite challenging.