Scan barcode
A review by spinesinaline
Northanger Abbey by Jane Austen
funny
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
It was fairly enjoyable and funny but the romance was incredibly lacking in description, especially that ending! Show, don't tell, Jane!
This was the last of Austen’s full-length novels on my Austen to-read list and while it wasn’t a favourite, I’m very glad to have read it.
I haven’t read many Gothic books but I think it’d be an added enjoyment for folks who have to pick up on all the jokes and comments that reference the genre. I wouldn’t necessarily classify this book as Gothic but Austen is clearly using the genre as inspiration and offering a fun tongue-in-cheek parody as the narrator clearly explains the way this story does, and does not, follow a traditional Gothic plot.
Because of this play on the genre, it feels quite different to her other books since much of it is a discussion of the genre from this external narrator. But I still loved the humour from these asides as well as the story itself.
The main issue for me was the reliance on ‘telling’ over ‘showing’ so it felt like a lot of the story wasn’t explored in as much detail as it could have. I was especially disappointed by the ending because of this (so much dialogue glossed over!) and the romance was difficult to get invested in. I wasn’t surprised to see that this was actually Austen’s first novel since I noticed the same kind of description in Sense and Sensibility but it’s good to know she improves later on!
This was the last of Austen’s full-length novels on my Austen to-read list and while it wasn’t a favourite, I’m very glad to have read it.
I haven’t read many Gothic books but I think it’d be an added enjoyment for folks who have to pick up on all the jokes and comments that reference the genre. I wouldn’t necessarily classify this book as Gothic but Austen is clearly using the genre as inspiration and offering a fun tongue-in-cheek parody as the narrator clearly explains the way this story does, and does not, follow a traditional Gothic plot.
Because of this play on the genre, it feels quite different to her other books since much of it is a discussion of the genre from this external narrator. But I still loved the humour from these asides as well as the story itself.
The main issue for me was the reliance on ‘telling’ over ‘showing’ so it felt like a lot of the story wasn’t explored in as much detail as it could have. I was especially disappointed by the ending because of this (so much dialogue glossed over!) and the romance was difficult to get invested in. I wasn’t surprised to see that this was actually Austen’s first novel since I noticed the same kind of description in Sense and Sensibility but it’s good to know she improves later on!