The City and the Stars in certain aspects felt like it could be dystopian, utopian, or even both. It really comes down to a matter of perspective, and whether ignorance really is bliss. This is an observation that isn't nearly quite that central to the book, but it stood out as I don't feel I've read a book so far which held that unique quality. Even if I'm off the mark, I still value the idea whether intended or not.

There isn't much else I can say of merit in this review that wouldn't be without spoilers. I will say it was a stark contrast to Rendevous with Rama, Rama was a linear story The City and the Stars was very multi-layered. The story repetitively turned into something new with every revelation the protagonist came across.

I think I can safely say now Arthur C. Clarke is a science fiction author that I'd enjoy any book of his I would happen to pick up. A quality up until now I only felt with Philip K. Dick.