Reviews with content warning for Death - L'Éveil du Léviathan

This is definitely going on the re-read list. Probably on a list of books to buy, which is meaningful considering I’m broke.

I read the book after watching the first episode of the show and fell in love so hard I don’t think I can be impartial about evaluating the books good-ness.

Deep characters, realistic dialogue, deep lore and world building.

A note on the writing of relationships …

It’s the one and only sci fi book I have ever read, written by a man (men?) that had a sex scene WITHOUT bodily objectifying women. Without bodily objectifying anyone. Such a minor plot point, less than two pages, but for me it reframed my expectations of the book. No weird porny misogyny. Just an earnest description of what it means to share intimacy

One aggravating, potential plot hole (hence the half star deduction)

Why the fuck wouldn’t they just crash Eros into the sun as planned? It’s great for the plot to have it land on Venus but it was so out of character and out of dynamic

I’m not mad though, because I would have hated for this to only be one book. But I hope they get their shit together on the next one tbh

Content Warnings

jupitermond's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Content Warnings

franceselsie's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark mysterious tense fast-paced

Plot- or character-driven? Plot
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? It's complicated
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Content Warnings

ariel790's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional reflective medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? Yes
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Miller was and still continues to be my favorite character from this series. Next to Amos, but this book isn't about him. I was originally introduced to the expanse through Sci-fi's TV series and am reading the books because I enjoyed the show. From what I have heard from others, the books' have so much more depth. After reading this one, so far I agree. Book matches season one, but gives a lot more insight.

Set in the future, after humanity has improved space travel and made it all the way out to a few of the moons of Saturn - The story flips back and forth, chapter by chapter, between James Holden of the ice hauler ship (the Canterbury), and Josephus Miller who is a detective stationed on Ceres (an asteroid rigged to support human life). Disaster happens and you as a reader are able to experience the after effects from two point of views. The optimist and a realist.

I really enjoyed the layers this story has. It could be classified as a number of things - horror, space odyssey, love story, etc. It has a lot, but does it well with great characters and an intriguing story.

Content Warnings

m_hates_reading's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark lighthearted mysterious tense medium-paced

Plot- or character-driven? A mix
Strong character development? It's complicated
Loveable characters? Yes
Diverse cast of characters? Yes
Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

5.0

Leviathan Wakes - The Expanse Book One by James SA Corey

5/5 loved every moment.

Sci-fi has been a massive part of my life for as long as I can remember. So far, The Expanse is seeming like the perfect compilation of all the the best parts of science fiction - and there’s just enough real-world physics to keep me from nearly screaming every time I turn a page because there’s no possible way what’s happening is feasible under the conditions.

I have a love hate relationship with multi-pov books bc I always find I like one character way more than the other, and only really enjoy their chapters, but I think it’s used really well here. It’s third person closed (focused on a specific character’s experiences and only uses info that character has at the time) and alternates focus between the two main characters each chapter. I found the split-focus did a really good job setting up the novel, as I wasn’t entirely sure what kind of world I was going into. It worked with one characters story line setting up the politics of it all, and the other the action, until they met up in the middle - at the same point those two parts of the story collided

- a war broke out.

It also worked to really build the conflict between the characters throughout the story - both “good guys” but with very different ideals and opinions about humanity’s nature - and gave the relationship much more depth and meaning.

Unless I’m going to be incredibly nit-picky and pull out specific sentence structure I would have changed - I have not one complaint.

I’ve started the series on recommendation by my English teacher, and it’s actually kinda surprising that he got my style perfectly right based of just a couple conversations about specific books and teaching me.

Content Warnings

More...