Reviews

Het oog in de deur by Pat Barker

becca_j's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Grade B--I did not enjoy this book nearly as much as Regeneration. Pryor is not an appealing character and the early parts of the book suffered having him as the main character. Once Rivers appears the book improves substantially. Still, this is a well written, thought provoking book that casts a interesting light on World War I.

nattly's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark informative reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

mon_3's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional reflective tense medium-paced

2.0

sophiemundy13's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

sheamussweeney's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional hopeful reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

em_binks's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging emotional reflective medium-paced

5.0

jennyhyam's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional informative reflective tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

casbah's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Enjoyable, if you were really, really into the first novel/Billy Prior (which I was.) Otherwise, I don't think you'd be very interested. It carries on with the anti-war theme but also expands on something Barker hinted at in Regeneration -- the experience of homosexuality/bisexuality during that time. I quite like it, but I really do think that if I wasn't so smitten with Regeneration, I'd have been bored. It is a nice reread too. I read it first when I was much younger and it's even better now.

minsies's review against another edition

Go to review page

1.0

(Dug review out of the depths of LiveJournal.)

[This and The Ghost Road] are very disappointing. I think the difference is the amount of space devoted to Prior in these last two. He is an interesting character in the first book, especially as he stands in contrast to all the actual, historical characters, but when he's taken away from most of them, he loses all of that. And then there's Rivers's time with the natives, which is tedious.

lennartvn's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

So much to say about this book, or this trilogy in its entirety. A beautifully crafted story of pre- and post-war trauma, masculinity and male relationships. Highly recommended.