You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
Scan barcode
freakazoidvoid's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I listened to the audiobook after watching the 2024 film. I think the audio version definetly added to the experience, especially with Lees bizzare routines and monologues, as one of my favorite parts of the movie was Daniel Craig’s read of certain lines and his inflection. The book is a different kind of sad, but the same strange, compelling, deeply vulnerable, deeply human story. What else is there to say? Raw and ugly, fleetingly tender. Above all…Queer, in content and form.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Alcoholism, Drug abuse, Homophobia, Racial slurs, and Racism
Moderate: Pedophilia
erikawynn's review against another edition
2.0
Wanted to read this after seeing Luca Guadagnino’s movie Queer and the first 3/4 is a really straightforward adaption but with a lot more pedophilia in the Burroughs version. I feel confident saying I’m a Burroughs hater.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Drug abuse, Pedophilia, Racial slurs, and Racism
schopenhauers_poodle's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
tense
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
An early work from Burroughs about queer longing that still feels contemporary.
I've been going through Burroughs' novels starting with "Junky" which I did not particularly like. "Queer", on the other hand, I found to be a poignant story of frustrated desire. Originally meant to be published with "Junky" as a juxtaposition of need and desire, "Queer" stands on it's own. Where I found "Junky" flat, disjointed, and it's shock value significantly diminished from time and more progressive attitudes, "Queer" was better written & edited, the story vulnerable and emotionally brutal. And despite the introduction's claims, "Queer" has a straightforward narrative with a more developed plot and characters than "Junky." The background of Mexico City and expat life in all it's excesses and abuses was also excellent.
I have yet to see the movie, but if you've never read Burroughs before, be forewarned that his protagonists are not likeable or of upstanding moral character; in fact, they're often pathetic and repugnant. However, that is not a prerequisite for good writing or even relatability to aspects of "Lee." (And skip the introduction if you don't want spoilers.)
Burroughs should have published this one and not waited decades.
I've been going through Burroughs' novels starting with "Junky" which I did not particularly like. "Queer", on the other hand, I found to be a poignant story of frustrated desire. Originally meant to be published with "Junky" as a juxtaposition of need and desire, "Queer" stands on it's own. Where I found "Junky" flat, disjointed, and it's shock value significantly diminished from time and more progressive attitudes, "Queer" was better written & edited, the story vulnerable and emotionally brutal. And despite the introduction's claims, "Queer" has a straightforward narrative with a more developed plot and characters than "Junky." The background of Mexico City and expat life in all it's excesses and abuses was also excellent.
I have yet to see the movie, but if you've never read Burroughs before, be forewarned that his protagonists are not likeable or of upstanding moral character; in fact, they're often pathetic and repugnant. However, that is not a prerequisite for good writing or even relatability to aspects of "Lee." (And skip the introduction if you don't want spoilers.)
Burroughs should have published this one and not waited decades.
Content Warnings
Minor: Addiction, Adult/minor relationship, Alcoholism, Cursing, Death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Hate crime, Homophobia, Pedophilia, Racism, Sexual content, Toxic relationship, Toxic friendship, Alcohol, and Colonisation
emluss99's review against another edition
challenging
dark
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction and Drug abuse
Moderate: Pedophilia
rebeckb's review against another edition
dark
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Homophobia and Racial slurs
Moderate: Pedophilia
maestro_cerrotorcido's review against another edition
challenging
dark
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
0.5
A friend gave me this book for my birthday. I think she maybe grabbed it at a thrift store and didn't really research much into it. I had never heard of William Burroughs nor the Beat Generation. I hated the author from the introduction where he uses a racial slur and would have DNF'd this book really early if it hadn't been a gift. And even though the book was written earlier (maybe the 50's?), the introduction is dated in 1985 when the book was published. The book is described as semi-autobiographical which makes me dislike Burroughs even more because to call every character in the book unlikable would be an understatement. Lee is horribly racist, misogynistic, and pedo-y. The reader is asked to take into account that he is going with withdrawal so his libido is coming back which doesn't sit well with me. I then researched more of Burroughs's life and found out that I not only dislike him more but he is a pretty famous and liked author which is baffling to me.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Adult/minor relationship, Alcoholism, Cursing, Drug abuse, Drug use, Homophobia, Misogyny, Pedophilia, Racism, Sexism, Violence, and Alcohol
letheii's review against another edition
funny
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
i bought this book soon as i came out of the cinema, just seen queer, and it is so interesting how justin kuritzkes (and luca guadgnino) do so much justice for the story.
if i could give an award to the yapper of all time, lee would be the winner
if i could give an award to the yapper of all time, lee would be the winner
Content Warnings
Moderate: Pedophilia
scientistjose's review against another edition
dark
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
Content Warnings
Graphic: Pedophilia, Racial slurs, and Racism
tasteofcherrry's review against another edition
1.0
I found almost no appealing or touching parts in this one. I didn’t like the style of prose or the way it uses character perspectives. I didn’t like the lackluster story arc, or any of the underdeveloped characters. Half of this very short book is just people monologuing about random stuff. Upon some research I realize this was a beatnik-esque stylistic choice, however it wasn’t for me. I’ve read modernist works that use stream of consciousness and fluid narration from the late 1800’s, with similar levels of racism, that were heaps more interesting to read.
Lee’s subconscious desire and search for love, connection and understanding is pretty universal– so that was cool I guess. The tragedy of him looking for them in drug-ridden avenues and in relationship dynamics that are inhospitable to true affection. But I never felt like this aspect was what the book focused on, and I couldn’t find it in me to care much.
On top of all of this, this entire novel (that’s set in South America) is written through a vile, nauseating colonial lens. The way non-white people are described and referred to were disgusting. Plus, Lee is literally a pedophile. This isn’t explored in a Nobokov style; we learn this in a throwaway scene. None of these are really related to Lee’s ‘loneliness’ or the effects of his addiction.
I decided to read this before watching the 2024 Luca Guadagnino adaptation, so now I’m quite nervous. I hope he was able to give more depth and nuance to the story and actually have something more substantial to say.
Lee’s subconscious desire and search for love, connection and understanding is pretty universal– so that was cool I guess. The tragedy of him looking for them in drug-ridden avenues and in relationship dynamics that are inhospitable to true affection. But I never felt like this aspect was what the book focused on, and I couldn’t find it in me to care much.
On top of all of this, this entire novel (that’s set in South America) is written through a vile, nauseating colonial lens. The way non-white people are described and referred to were disgusting. Plus, Lee is literally a pedophile. This isn’t explored in a Nobokov style; we learn this in a throwaway scene. None of these are really related to Lee’s ‘loneliness’ or the effects of his addiction.
I decided to read this before watching the 2024 Luca Guadagnino adaptation, so now I’m quite nervous. I hope he was able to give more depth and nuance to the story and actually have something more substantial to say.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Pedophilia, Racial slurs, and Racism
linaslzr's review against another edition
challenging
dark
reflective
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
I like the introduction which provided more context for the story and also found the appendix interesting, learning about the author's relationship to the manuscript, not having read it for sp many years bc of how traumatic it was.
I found the prose simple but interesting enough. The writing was quite visceral and graphic at times, and really vague others. A bit of weird mix of straightforward narrative and disjointed monologues. I think it did a good job of portraying a really deep sadness, and I guess I did end up feeling some sympathy for him at times. It felt like he was projecteing his desperation, self-deprecation, and bitterness onto his view of the world, which also reflects societal norms, especially for the time that it was written. It felt incomplete which I guess make sense.
I found the prose simple but interesting enough. The writing was quite visceral and graphic at times, and really vague others. A bit of weird mix of straightforward narrative and disjointed monologues. I think it did a good job of portraying a really deep sadness, and I guess I did end up feeling some sympathy for him at times. It felt like he was projecteing his desperation, self-deprecation, and bitterness onto his view of the world, which also reflects societal norms, especially for the time that it was written. It felt incomplete which I guess make sense.
Content Warnings
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Animal cruelty, Animal death, Drug abuse, Drug use, Mental illness, Misogyny, Pedophilia, Racial slurs, Racism, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Violence, Alcohol, and Sexual harassment