You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

Reviews tagging 'Infidelity'

La fille du diable by Jenni Fagan

6 reviews

cryotart's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark funny reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

Let's start off by saying - this book is unlike any I've read before. The mildly interconnected POVs, the storytelling, the writing style... I highly enjoyed the historical aspect of it, and though I was skeptical of the fact that the book was divided into multiple POVs told by characters from different decades (1910s - 1999), I ended up loving many of the vignettes and the way they were told. My favorites were Flora, Agnes, and Ivor. I was pleasantly surprised by the diversity and the LGBTQ+ representation (it warmed my queer heart a lot). I also found that each character's voice was very unique, and with such a large cast, all of whom ARE the main characters of their own story, it is hard to do. Furthermore, the commentary on society, the world and people's struggles was brilliant. Props to the author!

However, I would argue that the book's description does not fit what actually happens in it. Yes, the story starts off strong - devil's daughter, wealthy couple, things go HORRIBLY WRONG
(Mr Udnam hate club, that man deserves all the suffering in the world for murdering the people he did)
- but what happens after made me feel a bit disappointed (even though I ended up loving some of the stories). The description promised horror, a curse and mystical elements, which I found were somewhat poorly executed. The curse and what happened at the beginning of the book did not affect the characters' life much (except for Agnes), if at all, and since we knew what caused it from the very beginning, there was no sense of mystery. The only connecting factor was that the characters all lived in the same building (but often, at different points in time), and the "horror" premise of the book barely interfered with their lives. In addition, due to the fact that there were so many POVs (each character only got 3 chapters for their story) and they were all set in different decades, it was hard to fully immerse yourself in any of the stories. I would just start to like the character, relate to them, or begin to understand their story, and then it would all change or just stop. This book was more like a collection of many short stories about the tenants of one building and their lives than a proper narrative. But, perhaps it's just the style and my unfamiliarity with it. Nothing wrong with it. 

My last two cents: 1) there were no quotation marks or dialogue tags, and, oftentimes, I found it hard to understand who was talking. 2) this book is NOT clean, and I was quite shocked by the amount of s*x mentions, talks about it and the short descriptions of the act itself. It did make me uncomfortable at times, as I found many of the inclusions of the topic to be unnecessary. It did fit SOME narratives (Flora's and Jessie's, for example), but other than that... Idk. Perhaps I'm too asexual for this. 

Overall, I did highly enjoy the book's reflective and witty commentaries, the representation, the historical description of Edinburgh and a good half of the stories. It was a great read, and props to the cover artist for the gorgeous cover. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

georgiesutton's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.5

I thought this sounded intriguing. I liked the glimpses into the different lives in Lukenbooth Close but I did find the plot a little lacking. This was only a problem as I really really didn't care for some of the characters (William - what was the point of his chapters?) whereas others I loved. This was almost more like short stories in that regard. It was a bit spicier than I expected! 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

nialiversuch's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark emotional mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

beccajdb's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

2.5

Dating, yes. Transgressive, yes. But also surprisingly tedious after a while. The clunky injections of historical research and period set-dressing make it infuriatingly choppy. The William Burroughs chapters are the worst - they read like someone showing off. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

lexa_oxford's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious reflective medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

This book is a really interesting one where the house is practically a main character itself, and we follow its multiple tenants across a century. I found some of the stories much more engaging than others, and almost wished that a couple of the stories had been cut to expand on the ones that really told an over-arching message which Fagan really wanted to get across. Also she did a lot of telling rather than showing, which I felt was a shame.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

alisonannk's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings